There is also Interactive Brokers API, which used to be a lower cost
alternative.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:57 PM, wrote:
> Yes, I also like that one. Problem is that they give access only to US
> citizens and some limited countries.
>
> m.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Fox
> T
That is a good point. I am usually there in #ghc with nickname lemao.
Niklas is nh2 afaik.
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
> Would you mind hanging around in #ghc when working on it?
>
> A few people found this interesting, so this might be useful to avoid
> duplicate e
g on cabal. Is this right?
>
>
> 2013/9/6 Herbert Valerio Riedel
>
>> On 2013-09-06 at 15:13:58 +0200, Yuri de Wit wrote:
>> > I spent some time looking into the touch points between ghc and cabal in
>> > the past, and the first oddity i saw was a direct depende
I spent some time looking into the touch points between ghc and cabal in
the past, and the first oddity i saw was a direct dependency from ghc to
the cabal sources. After taking a closer look it seems that ghc shares some
common, low level modules with cabal that didnt seem to justify the whole
dep
as it doesn't seem
the right forum to discuss it.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 4, 2013 11:41:33 PM UTC+2, Yuri de Wit wrote:
>
>> Thanks for all the hard work!
>>
>> If you see this in OSX (#1009) while installi
Thanks for all the hard work!
If you see this in OSX (#1009) while installing cabal 1.18:
*Warning: could not create a symlink in /Users/lemao/Library/Haskell/bin for
*
*cabal because the file exists there already but is not managed by cabal.
You*
*can create a symlink for this executable manuall
Would this be relevant?
https://github.com/jonsterling/Data.Records
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Jon Fairbairn
wrote:
> Twan van Laarhoven writes:
>
> > On 24/10/12 12:08, Jon Fairbairn wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there a convenient way of handling a data structure with lots
> >> of fields of dif
