On Wed, 5 May 2004, Frank Atanassow wrote:
Frankly, I think it's completely unrealistic to expect to be able to
fairly evaluate Haskell in 32 hours. As you noted yourself, Scheme and
Erlang, being strict, are much closer to conventional programming
languages than Haskell is, so it's easier to
Hi folks,
I've got an interesting task this week for my job. (Note that this will
undoubtably last for longer than a week). I'm evaluating several
high-level languages as development vehicles for our next suite of
applications. The languages I'm currently considering are Scheme, Erlang,
and
On Tue, 4 May 2004, Bill Walsh wrote:
I am amazed that you can even think of doing anything in a week.
I have been at it for at least 15 years: one project; one dead set
proof-of-concept .
Well I'm sure you're doing something much more useful/worthwhile than I!
=)
I understand that the
