On 17 December 2005 21:57, Ketil Malde wrote:
> "Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On 16 December 2005 10:05, Joel Reymont wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying to restrict GHC to 800Mb of heap at runtime by passing in
>>> +RTS -M800M, the machine has 1Gb of memory and top shows free
>>> physica
| Is there any chance there is a bug in recent GHCs (or perhaps Linux?)
| affecting this? I'm fairly sure I've lately seen Haskell programs
| consuming significantly larger amounts of memory than they should be
| allowed to, and I can try to isolate a test case if it is of
| interest.
New bugs a
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:56:58PM +0100, Ketil Malde wrote:
> Is there any chance there is a bug in recent GHCs (or perhaps Linux?)
> affecting this? I'm fairly sure I've lately seen Haskell programs
> consuming significantly larger amounts of memory than they should be
> allowed to, and I can tr
"Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 16 December 2005 10:05, Joel Reymont wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to restrict GHC to 800Mb of heap at runtime by passing in
>> +RTS -M800M, the machine has 1Gb of memory and top shows free
>> physical memory dropping below 175Mb.
> -M800m should do more o
On 16 December 2005 10:05, Joel Reymont wrote:
> I'm trying to restrict GHC to 800Mb of heap at runtime by passing in
> +RTS -M800M, the machine has 1Gb of memory and top shows free
> physical memory dropping below 175Mb. I suppose I'm missing something
> obvious or paying attention to the wrong s
Folks,
I'm trying to restrict GHC to 800Mb of heap at runtime by passing in
+RTS -M800M, the machine has 1Gb of memory and top shows free
physical memory dropping below 175Mb. I suppose I'm missing something
obvious or paying attention to the wrong statistics, Unix has a good
VM manager a
