On Feb 8, 2008 9:55 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not been following closely but if Don thinks there's a bug there
probably is. Can someone submit a bug report pls? Better still a patch! :-)
Simon
Ok, I filed a bug report.
ryani.spam:
It looks like there is a bug with unparsing of bang-constructors in ghci:
On 2/7/08, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
data Stream a = forall s. Unlifted s =
Stream !(s - Step a s) -- ^ a stepper
function
It looks like there is a bug with unparsing of bang-constructors in ghci:
On 2/7/08, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
data Stream a = forall s. Unlifted s =
Stream !(s - Step a s) -- ^ a stepper function
!s
chad.scherrer:
Hello haskell-cafe,
In ghci, I tried to get info for Data.Stream.Stream:
$ ghci
GHCi, version 6.8.2: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Loading package base ... linking ... done.
Prelude :m Data.Stream
Prelude Data.Stream :i Stream
data Stream a where
Stream ::
Hello haskell-cafe,
In ghci, I tried to get info for Data.Stream.Stream:
$ ghci
GHCi, version 6.8.2: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Loading package base ... linking ... done.
Prelude :m Data.Stream
Prelude Data.Stream :i Stream
data Stream a where
Stream :: forall a s.
On 7 Feb 2008, at 12:30 PM, Chad Scherrer wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008 11:57 AM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, yes, missing parens! Well spotted.
So a pretty printer wibble in GHC?
-- Don
Yeah, that was my first concern, but then I noticed the quantification
was different, so I'm still
