Re: [Haskell-cafe] [darcs-users] Darcs failure

2010-12-26 Thread Ketil Malde
Andrew Coppin andrewcop...@btinternet.com writes: but you should look into the pkill command, which allows you to kill processes (including sending signals other than SIGTERM) by name. It's installed by default on Ubuntu. Or 'killall'. Which has (had) the interesting namesake on Solaris

Re: [Haskell-cafe] [darcs-users] Darcs failure

2010-12-24 Thread Andrew Coppin
On 24/12/2010 09:58 AM, Miles Gould wrote: Hi Andrew, Others have probably told you this, Actually no... but you should look into the pkill command, which allows you to kill processes (including sending signals other than SIGTERM) by name. It's installed by default on Ubuntu. Mmm, OK.

Re: [Haskell-cafe] [darcs-users] Darcs failure

2010-12-24 Thread Gregory Crosswhite
On 12/24/10 4:08 PM, Andrew Coppin wrote: Gotta love the way that this is THE MOST COMMON USE CASE for kill, and yet kill itself doesn't support doing this. The problem with killing processes by name is that names aren't unique, so you might unintentionally end up killing other processes that

Re: [Haskell-cafe] [darcs-users] Darcs failure

2010-12-22 Thread Eric Kow
Andrew, Thanks for your report. Indeed, please direct future reports to darcs-users or b...@darcs.net darcs: bug at src/URL.hs:246 compiled Sep 12 2010 20:24:56 Another possible bug in URL.waitNextUrl: curl_multi_perform() - no running handles See

Re: [Haskell-cafe] [darcs-users] Darcs failure

2010-12-22 Thread Andrew Coppin
On 22/12/2010 11:08 AM, Eric Kow wrote: Andrew, Thanks for your report. Indeed, please direct future reports to darcs-users or b...@darcs.net That would require me to sign up to yet another mailing list just to report one bug. And given that we're talking about a prebuilt binary being

Re: [Haskell-cafe] [darcs-users] Darcs failure

2010-12-22 Thread Jason Dagit
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Andrew Coppin andrewcop...@btinternet.comwrote: On 22/12/2010 11:08 AM, Eric Kow wrote: Andrew, Thanks for your report. Indeed, please direct future reports to darcs-users or b...@darcs.net That would require me to sign up to yet another mailing list just

Re: [Haskell-cafe] [darcs-users] Darcs failure

2010-12-22 Thread Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
On 23 December 2010 00:09, Andrew Coppin andrewcop...@btinternet.com wrote: Presumably the only way to do that would be to build one. (?) As I understand it, apt-get and similar tools are designed to 100% prevent you having any choice whatsoever over the version numbers of stuff that gets