Claus Reinke wrote:
if i wanted to use that library
for
anything i want to distribute, my only chance to avoid the source
re-distribution
and advertising clauses would be dynamic linking
I believe that the magical protective properties of dynamic linking
amount to no more than folklore. So
On May 2, 2007, at 7:00 , Claus Reinke wrote:
my question. similarly for the unix dependency - it could be
inherent in the
design, or an accident of the author's current platform.
The Haskell libraries don't currently provide a platform-independent
way to do most file tests. I discovered
Hi
> no, i browsed the license file before asking my question (no non-restrictive
> license needs to be longer than a page). if i wanted to use that library for
> anything i want to distribute, my only chance to avoid the source
re-distribution
> and advertising clauses would be dynamic linking
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 12:00 +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
> >> i'm a fan of find | xargs, so a portable haskell replacement unencumbered
> >> by viral licenses would be very welcome. i have no intention to participate
> >> in yet-another-licencing-discussion, i would just like to ask whether
> >> tho
i'm a fan of find | xargs, so a portable haskell replacement unencumbered
by viral licenses would be very welcome. i have no intention to participate
in yet-another-licencing-discussion, i would just like to ask whether those
limitations of your offering are an accident or intended?
http://hack
