Who needs to build futures into the language -- all you need is MVars, eh?
-- Don
vanenkj:
> I'd also like to point out that Chris did this with 165 lines of
> code--including comments and whitespace! If you drop the whitespace and
> comments, it's only 91 lines!
>
__
I'd also like to point out that Chris did this with 165 lines of
code--including comments and whitespace! If you drop the whitespace and
comments, it's only 91 lines!
/jve
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:54 PM, ChrisK wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As a side effect of the discussion of the new C++ future/promis
This is way cool!
/jve
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:54 PM, ChrisK wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As a side effect of the discussion of the new C++ future/promise features
> at http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/3221 I have implemented a Haskell
> package called "future" at
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-
Hello,
As a side effect of the discussion of the new C++ future/promise features at
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/3221 I have implemented a Haskell package
called "future" at
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/future
This ought to do what C++ standard futures/
