On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> * Manuel Gómez [2013-05-23 08:33:15-0430]
> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Roman Cheplyaka
> wrote:
> > > Pull requests are welcome, but let's stick to widely agreed changes
> > > (like the Foldable/Traversable one). I think one of t
* Manuel Gómez [2013-05-23 08:33:15-0430]
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> > Pull requests are welcome, but let's stick to widely agreed changes
> > (like the Foldable/Traversable one). I think one of the reasons why
> > other Preludes haven't been adopted is because th
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> Pull requests are welcome, but let's stick to widely agreed changes
> (like the Foldable/Traversable one). I think one of the reasons why
> other Preludes haven't been adopted is because they were too radical.
>
> * Andreas Abel [2013-05-2
On 23 May 2013 11:54, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 23.05.2013, 11:52 +0200 schrieb Bas van Dijk:
>> On 23 May 2013 11:26, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>> > So you can get what you want by not
>> > depending on base, but rather have prelude-prime re-export all modules
>> > from
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 23.05.2013, 11:52 +0200 schrieb Bas van Dijk:
> On 23 May 2013 11:26, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > So you can get what you want by not
> > depending on base, but rather have prelude-prime re-export all modules
> > from base plus its own Preldue.
>
> How would you re-export
On 23 May 2013 11:26, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> So you can get what you want by not
> depending on base, but rather have prelude-prime re-export all modules
> from base plus its own Preldue.
How would you re-export all base's modules from the prelude-prime
package? I didn't know this was already
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Anton Kholomiov wrote:
> I wish it was possible to use an extension
>
> CustomPrelude = Prelude.Prime
>
> In the cabal file
>
>
>
I'm not necessarily opposed to this idea, but I'd like to point out that it
can have a negative impact on readability of an individua
HI,
Am Donnerstag, den 23.05.2013, 12:38 +0400 schrieb Anton Kholomiov:
> I wish it was possible to use an extension
>
> CustomPrelude = Prelude.Prime
>
> In the cabal file
as far as I know, GHC simply issues an implicit
import Prelude
without package qualifiers. So you can get what you want
I wish it was possible to use an extension
CustomPrelude = Prelude.Prime
In the cabal file
2013/5/23 Roman Cheplyaka
> I liked Andreas's idea (cited below). Hence the new package
> prelude-prime.
>
> https://github.com/feuerbach/prelude-prime
> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/prelude-pri
I liked Andreas's idea (cited below). Hence the new package
prelude-prime.
https://github.com/feuerbach/prelude-prime
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/prelude-prime
Pull requests are welcome, but let's stick to widely agreed changes
(like the Foldable/Traversable one). I think one of the reason
10 matches
Mail list logo