Don Stewart ha scritto:
grzegorz.chrupala:
Hi all,
Is there a serialization library other than the Data.Binary from hackage?
I am using Data.Binary in a couple of projects, but I have found its stack
and memory usage very hard to control. Its very common that decoding a map
or list of non-trivi
Don Stewart-2 wrote:
>
> Have you tried the latest release, which modified the Map and [a]
> instances?
>
No, I'm working with 0.5. I'll give the new version a try. Thanks!
--
Grzegorz
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Alternative-to-Data.Binary-tp22512229p22514771.html
grzegorz.chrupala:
>
> Hi all,
> Is there a serialization library other than the Data.Binary from hackage?
>
> I am using Data.Binary in a couple of projects, but I have found its stack
> and memory usage very hard to control. Its very common that decoding a map
> or list of non-trivial size uses
Svein Ove Aas ha scritto:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Grzegorz Chrupala
wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a serialization library other than the Data.Binary from hackage?
I am using Data.Binary in a couple of projects, but I have found its stack
and memory usage very hard to control. Its very commo
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Grzegorz Chrupala
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Is there a serialization library other than the Data.Binary from hackage?
>
> I am using Data.Binary in a couple of projects, but I have found its stack
> and memory usage very hard to control. Its very common that decoding a
Hi all,
Is there a serialization library other than the Data.Binary from hackage?
I am using Data.Binary in a couple of projects, but I have found its stack
and memory usage very hard to control. Its very common that decoding a map
or list of non-trivial size uses up all available RAM, or causes
