Thank you Bulat, makes total sense. This list is a treasure trove of
a resource.
I guess this is what happens when you go from Erlang to Haskell :-).
I'm conditioned to think of everything as a process and uses
processes for everything.
On Dec 13, 2005, at 11:17 AM, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Joel,
Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 1:05:10 PM, you wrote:
>> are you read dewscription of my own Process library in haskell
>> maillist?
JR> No. Can you give me a pointer?
i will forward it to you. it have meaning to be subcribed there, just
to see interesting announcements
>> btw, i sugge
Hello Tomasz,
Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 12:49:04 PM, you wrote:
TZ> On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 04:00:46PM +, Joel Reymont wrote:
>> One particular thing that bugs me is that I cannot really use TChan
>> for thread mailboxes. I don't think I experienced this problem with
>> Erlang but using
On Dec 13, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 04:00:46PM +, Joel Reymont wrote:
One particular thing that bugs me is that I cannot really use TChan
for thread mailboxes. I don't think I experienced this problem with
Erlang but using a TChan with a logger threa
On Dec 13, 2005, at 1:13 AM, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
are you read dewscription of my own Process library in haskell
maillist?
No. Can you give me a pointer?
btw, i suggested you to try not using logging thread entirely, making
all logging actions synchronously
I cannot. Only one thread can
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 04:00:46PM +, Joel Reymont wrote:
> One particular thing that bugs me is that I cannot really use TChan
> for thread mailboxes. I don't think I experienced this problem with
> Erlang but using a TChan with a logger thread quickly overwhelms the
> logger and fills t
Hello Joel,
Monday, December 12, 2005, 7:00:46 PM, you wrote:
JR> 1) Processes, aka threads with single-slot in/out mailboxes
are you read dewscription of my own Process library in haskell
maillist?
JR> One particular thing that bugs me is that I cannot really use TChan
JR> for thread mailboxes
On 12/12/05, Joel Reymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I love the Erlang multi-processing experience and think that a lot of
> the mistakes that I made could be avoided. What I want to have is
>
> 1) Processes, aka threads with single-slot in/out mailboxes
> 2) A facility to keep a list
Folks,
I love the Erlang multi-processing experience and think that a lot of
the mistakes that I made could be avoided. What I want to have is
1) Processes, aka threads with single-slot in/out mailboxes
2) A facility to keep a list of such processes and send events to
them using their proce
