On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 10:41:57PM -0500, wren ng thornton wrote:
> Marc Weber wrote:
> > Should there be two versions?
> > hslogger-bytestring and hslogger-string?
>
> I'd just stick with one (with a module for hiding the conversions, as
> desired). Duplicating the code introduces too much ro
Marc Weber wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 10:41:57PM -0500, wren ng thornton wrote:
>> Marc Weber wrote:
>>> Should there be two versions?
>>> hslogger-bytestring and hslogger-string?
>> I'd just stick with one (with a module for hiding the conversions, as
>> desired). Duplicating the code in
Marc Weber wrote:
wren ng thornton wrote:
> I'd just stick with one (with a module for hiding the conversions, as
> desired). Duplicating the code introduces too much room for maintenance and
> compatibility issues.
>
> That's the big thing. The more people that use ByteStrings the less ne
--- Begin Message ---
Marc Weber wrote:
the cabal file:
flag bytestring
Default: False
Description: enable this to use Bytestrings everywhere instead of
strings
[... now libs and executables: ...]
if flag(bytestring)
cpp-options: -DUSE_BYTESTRING
No, it's a very
