On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 01:13 -0500, Ryan Newton wrote:
Ok, I've made some progress in the direction Duncan suggested.
I can filter out the extra library before the postConf hook gets it.
And calling make from the hooks is pretty easy.
I've got a hack working that does allow full
Oops, I guess I misinterpreted package description. It did sound a little
dangerous ;-).
What you suggested also worked. I'm in good shape now.
Thanks again,
-Ryan
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:52 -0500, Ryan
Hi cafe,
I am trying to link a .a file built by a separate makefile into my
library. GHC has no problem with it, but I need to convince cabal to do it
for the package to be hackage-friendly. There's a thread about this back in
2007:
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 05:20 -0500, Ryan Newton wrote:
I am trying to link a .a file built by a separate makefile into my
library. GHC has no problem with it, but I need to convince cabal to
do it for the package to be hackage-friendly. There's a thread about
this back in 2007:
Thanks Duncan,
Alas, I don't think it's something I want to install globally on the users
machine. It's actually not much code, but I can't get cabal to build it
directly because it chokes on the .s assembly files (which are intel syntax
not ATT). Right now I'm depending on yasm. The makefile