[Haskell-cafe] Cabal package with BSD3 library and LGPL executable?

Hello all How do I mark a Cabal package as containing a BSD3 library and an LGPL executable? I'm using CppHs (LGPL) from the exe but have no dependencies on it in the library; as the library might be independently useful I want it to be BSD3. As a caveat - I don't want two packages... Thanks

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Cabal package with BSD3 library and LGPL executable?

Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com writes: I'm using CppHs (LGPL) from the exe but have no dependencies on it in the library; as the library might be independently useful I want it to be BSD3. Why not look at how cpphs does this itself? The library is LGPL but the executable is GPL. --

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Cabal package with BSD3 library and LGPL executable?

Hi Ivan Thanks. As far as the Cabal file goes - CppHs is LGPL, its in the included README that the GPL distinction is noticed. Possibly this isn't the clearest way of presenting things... On 29 April 2010 12:52, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote: Why not look at how cpphs

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Cabal package with BSD3 library and LGPL executable?

Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com writes: Thanks. As far as the Cabal file goes - CppHs is LGPL, its in the included README that the GPL distinction is noticed. Possibly this isn't the clearest way of presenting things... Well, currently Cabal only lets you specify one license, so your

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Cabal package with BSD3 library and LGPL executable?

On 29 Apr 2010, at 13:18, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote: Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com writes: Thanks. As far as the Cabal file goes - CppHs is LGPL, its in the included README that the GPL distinction is noticed. Possibly this isn't the clearest way of presenting things... Well,