On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Diego Souza wrote:
Hi,
currently when one install a cabal package it compiles it and then install
generated binaries. I wonder whether or not it would be useful to have
pre-compiled binaries as many package managers usually do (e.g. apt). I
often think that would save some
Am Sonntag 28 Februar 2010 23:20:00 schrieb Ivan Miljenovic:
> /me really wishes people stopped thinking of Cabal as a package manager
/me really wishes there were package managers as useful and easy as Cabal
for things other than Haskell :D
___
Haskell
On 28 February 2010 01:55, Diego Souza wrote:
> currently when one install a cabal package it compiles it and then install
> generated binaries. I wonder whether or not it would be useful to have
> pre-compiled binaries as many package managers usually do (e.g. apt). I
> often think that would sav
Am Samstag 27 Februar 2010 16:39:27 schrieb Andrew Coppin:
> Diego Souza wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > currently when one install a cabal package it compiles it and then
> > install generated binaries. I wonder whether or not it would be useful
> > to have pre-compiled binaries as many package managers us
Diego Souza wrote:
Hi,
currently when one install a cabal package it compiles it and then
install generated binaries. I wonder whether or not it would be useful
to have pre-compiled binaries as many package managers usually do
(e.g. apt). I often think that would save some time on the expense
Hi,
currently when one install a cabal package it compiles it and then install
generated binaries. I wonder whether or not it would be useful to have
pre-compiled binaries as many package managers usually do (e.g. apt). I
often think that would save some time on the expense of a busier hackage
ser
