Felipe Lessa writes:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
> wrote:
>> Felipe Lessa writes:
>>> I'm sorry for being silly, but what's the motivation of having this
>>> canonic form? =)
>>
>> A few things come to mind:
>>
>> * Easier to reason about, [...]
>> * Less ambiguity:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
wrote:
> Felipe Lessa writes:
>> I'm sorry for being silly, but what's the motivation of having this
>> canonic form? =)
>
> A few things come to mind:
>
> * Easier to reason about, [...]
> * Less ambiguity: [...]
So you want to do some post-
Felipe Lessa writes:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
> wrote:
>> As such, I probably won't be implementing the canonical form stuff any
>> time soon in graphviz, and might need to examine Graphviz's source code
>> to compare it and ensure that it's at least similar :s
>
>
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
wrote:
> As such, I probably won't be implementing the canonical form stuff any
> time soon in graphviz, and might need to examine Graphviz's source code
> to compare it and ensure that it's at least similar :s
I'm sorry for being silly, but w
"Kevin Quick" writes:
> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:26:34 -0700, Ivan Miljenovic
> wrote:
>
>> Graphviz (http://graphviz.org/) has the option to convert provided
> Dot
>> code for visualising a graph into a canonical form. For example,
> take
>> the sample Dot code:
> [snip]
>> I've recently thought
On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:26:34 -0700, Ivan Miljenovic
wrote:
Graphviz (http://graphviz.org/) has the option to convert provided Dot
code for visualising a graph into a canonical form. For example, take
the sample Dot code:
[snip]
I've recently thought up a way that I can duplicate this functi
Graphviz (http://graphviz.org/) has the option to convert provided Dot
code for visualising a graph into a canonical form. For example, take
the sample Dot code:
| digraph foo {
| a [color=blue];
| subgraph cluster_bar {
| a [label="hi!"]
| b [color=blue, label="bye!"
