On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 08:04:25PM -0500, Austin Seipp wrote:
Excerpts from Justin Bailey's message of Thu Sep 04 17:00:58 -0500 2008:
Looking at the package, I think would be pretty painful though. It
seems I'd have to build the AST by hand,
The AST Language.C defines for C is actually
I am thinking of writing a simple library in Haskell which would be
useful in a number of different scenarios, and not always with
programs written in Haskell. That makes me think the library should be
C-compatible and able to link with C programs. Reading over chapter 9
of the GHC manual (Foreign
jgbailey:
I am thinking of writing a simple library in Haskell which would be
useful in a number of different scenarios, and not always with
programs written in Haskell. That makes me think the library should be
C-compatible and able to link with C programs. Reading over chapter 9
of the GHC
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Philippa Cowderoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would writing Haskell to generate the C via Language.C be an option?
Effectively you'd be using Haskell as a typeful macro system.
Interesting idea, and I've done similar things with haskelldb
(generating SQL queries).
On 2008 Sep 4, at 18:00, Justin Bailey wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Philippa Cowderoy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would writing Haskell to generate the C via Language.C be an option?
Effectively you'd be using Haskell as a typeful macro system.
Interesting idea, and I've done similar
Excerpts from Justin Bailey's message of Thu Sep 04 17:00:58 -0500 2008:
Looking at the package, I think would be pretty painful though. It
seems I'd have to build the AST by hand,
The AST Language.C defines for C is actually fairly regular once you
wrap your head around it - I got it to
