On 12/10/2010 15:17, Daniel Fischer wrote:
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 11:18:39, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 09/10/2010 10:07, Daniel Fischer wrote:
On Saturday 09 October 2010 06:34:32, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
That code is incorrect. You can't assume that the base for floating
point numbers is
On 09/10/2010 10:07, Daniel Fischer wrote:
On Saturday 09 October 2010 06:34:32, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
That code is incorrect. You can't assume that the base for floating
point numbers is 2, that's something you have to check.
(POWER6 and z9 has hardware support for base 10 floating
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 11:18:39, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 09/10/2010 10:07, Daniel Fischer wrote:
On Saturday 09 October 2010 06:34:32, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
That code is incorrect. You can't assume that the base for floating
point numbers is 2, that's something you have to check.
On Saturday 09 October 2010 06:34:32, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
That code is incorrect. You can't assume that the base for floating
point numbers is 2, that's something you have to check.
(POWER6 and z9 has hardware support for base 10 floating point.)
-- Lennart
Well, in light of
-- We
The methods of the RealFrac class produce garbage when the value lies
outside the range of the target type, e.g.
Prelude GHC.Float truncate 1.234e11 :: Int -- 32-bits
-1154051584
and, in the case of truncate, different garbage when the rewrite rule
fires:
Prelude GHC.Float double2Int
That code is incorrect. You can't assume that the base for floating
point numbers is 2, that's something you have to check.
(POWER6 and z9 has hardware support for base 10 floating point.)
-- Lennart
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Daniel Fischer daniel.is.fisc...@web.de wrote:
The methods
