Seen on Slashdot:
http://www.ddj.com/development-tools/212201710;jsessionid=3MQLTTYJRPL3CQSNDLRSKH0CJUNN2JVN
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Too bad they didn't pimp Haskell as practical.
--
_jsn
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
jason.dusek:
Too bad they didn't pimp Haskell as practical.
It looked like an archaic view of Haskell based on reading wikipedia,
imo. Perhaps we should take charge of the wikipedia page, if it is that
influential.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Amen to that. People who haven't really given a fair look at functional
langauges (Haskell in particular) seem to have a very poor conception of
them. Again, this seems to especially be a problem with Haskell (i.e., the
whole monads are hard thing)... If this is where people are getting their
dons:
jason.dusek:
Too bad they didn't pimp Haskell as practical.
It looked like an archaic view of Haskell based on reading wikipedia,
imo. Perhaps we should take charge of the wikipedia page, if it is that
influential.
To those reading, the wikipedia article is here,
