tpledger:
> Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
> [...]
> > While we're here we should fix:
> > chameneos
> > And anything else you want to take a
> > look at.
> >
> > A community page has been set up to
> > which you can submit improved entries:
> >
> http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Great_languag
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
[...]
> While we're here we should fix:
> chameneos
> And anything else you want to take a
> look at.
>
> A community page has been set up to
> which you can submit improved entries:
>
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Great_language_shootout
[...]
Well, then!
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
-snip-
> I agree. Breaking the rules was mainly the reason for the drop.
Entries
> like chameneos and fasta. Also, the other language teams kept
improving
> things.
Yes, I missed that opportunity for listing things in threes ;-)
Over the year improved programs were
On 11/11/06, Bulat Ziganshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Sebastian,
Saturday, November 11, 2006, 3:51:09 AM, you wrote:
> Meassuring lines of code is certainly not perfect, but IMO it's a lot
> more useful as a metric then gzipped bytes.
why they don't use word count??
I don't know. I s
Hello Isaac,
Saturday, November 11, 2006, 5:56:57 AM, you wrote:
> 2) Some Haskell programs were pushed into 'interesting alternative
> implementations' because they'd strayed so far from the spirit of the
> benchmark. (It takes a while for people to notice and complain, but
> eventually they do.
Hello Sebastian,
Saturday, November 11, 2006, 3:51:09 AM, you wrote:
> Meassuring lines of code is certainly not perfect, but IMO it's a lot
> more useful as a metric then gzipped bytes.
why they don't use word count??
--
Best regards,
Bulatmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
igouy2:
> > On 11/10/06, Henk-Jan van Tuyl wrote:
> >>
> >> Haskell suddenly dropped several places in the overall socre, when
> the
> >> size measurement changed from line-count to number-of-bytes after
> >> gzipping. Maybe it's worth it, to study why this is; Haskell
> programs
> >> are
> >> of
> On 11/10/06, Henk-Jan van Tuyl wrote:
>>
>> Haskell suddenly dropped several places in the overall socre, when
the
>> size measurement changed from line-count to number-of-bytes after
>> gzipping. Maybe it's worth it, to study why this is; Haskell
programs
>> are
>> often much more compact then
Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
On 11/10/06, Henk-Jan van Tuyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:44:15 +0100, Donald Bruce Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So back in January we had lots of fun tuning up Haskell code for the
> Great Language Shootout[1]. We did quite well at the ti
On 11/10/06, Henk-Jan van Tuyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:44:15 +0100, Donald Bruce Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So back in January we had lots of fun tuning up Haskell code for the
> Great Language Shootout[1]. We did quite well at the time, at one point
> rankin
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:44:15 +0100, Donald Bruce Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So back in January we had lots of fun tuning up Haskell code for the
Great Language Shootout[1]. We did quite well at the time, at one point
ranking overall first[2]. [...]
Haskell suddenly dropped several pla
So back in January we had lots of fun tuning up Haskell code for the
Great Language Shootout[1]. We did quite well at the time, at one point
ranking overall first[2]. After doing all we could with ghc 6.4.2, the
Haskell entries have been left for the last 10 months, while we worked
on new libraries
12 matches
Mail list logo
