On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
>
> do you know if there is another way either to compute the closure of a
> function or to serialize it in order to send the computation to
> another host?
>
You'll need to capture the functions as serializable data while it is being
constructed.
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 02:16 -0700, Fred Smith wrote:
> In seems to me that in cloud haskell library the function's closures
> can be computed only with top-level ones, is it possible to compute
> the closure at runtime of any function and to send it to another host?
The current rule is a bit overl
On 1 Ott, 12:03, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> I was at the Haskell Symposium where this paper was presented. This
> limitation is a known limitation and cannot currently be worked around
> other than my moving whatever is required to the top level.
>
> Erik
> --
do you know if there is another
I'm curious, what are the advantages of Cloud Haskell over pakages like rpc?
Why isn't Cloud Haskell on Hackage?
2011/10/1 Erik de Castro Lopo
> Fred Smith wrote:
>
> > I've built a little program to compute the plus function remotely by
> > using Cloud Haskell:
> > http://pastebin.com/RK4AcWFM
Fred Smith wrote:
> I've built a little program to compute the plus function remotely by
> using Cloud Haskell:
> http://pastebin.com/RK4AcWFM
>
> but i faced an unfortunate complication, what i would like to do is to
> send a function to another host, no matter if the function is locally
> decla
I've built a little program to compute the plus function remotely by
using Cloud Haskell:
http://pastebin.com/RK4AcWFM
but i faced an unfortunate complication, what i would like to do is to
send a function to another host, no matter if the function is locally
declared or at the top level.
In seem
