2008/9/10 David F. Place <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi, All.
>
> I needed to make a batch of edits to some input files after a big change
> in my program. Normally, one would choose some scripting language, but
> I can't bear to program in them. The nasty thing about using Haskell
> is that giving r
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 16:57 -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Whoa, that is sneaky and clever. But it will fail the minute you try
> to run this on a compiled program, because then getProgName will give
> you the binary executable.
So, I won't do that. In addition to getProgName getting the binar
2008/9/10 Olex P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi guys,
>
> Any ideas how to integrate Haskell into other software as scripting engine?
> Similarly to Python in Blender or GIMP or to JavaScript in the products from
> Adobe. Which possibilities we have?
This is also very interesting to me. At my day job
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:20:54PM -0400, David F. Place wrote:
> Hi, All.
>
> I needed to make a batch of edits to some input files after a big change
> in my program. Normally, one would choose some scripting language, but
> I can't bear to program in them. The nasty thing about using Haskell
Hi guys,
Any ideas how to integrate Haskell into other software as scripting engine?
Similarly to Python in Blender or GIMP or to JavaScript in the products from
Adobe. Which possibilities we have?
Cheers,
Alex.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:20 PM, David F. Place <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, A
Hi, All.
I needed to make a batch of edits to some input files after a big change
in my program. Normally, one would choose some scripting language, but
I can't bear to program in them. The nasty thing about using Haskell
is that giving regexes as string constants sometime requires two levels
o
