Dnia piątek, 21 grudnia 2012, Radical napisał:
> Thanks for the suggestion, Jan. Is there a way to include all of hackage?
Sorry, I don't know any way of doing this.
Janek
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/ma
Thanks for the suggestion, Jan. Is there a way to include all of hackage?
Alvaro
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Jan Stolarek wrote:
> > I see that the comments are from years ago. Are there any ongoing efforts
> > to expand the default search set? (Or alternatively, to implement the
> > +hack
2012/12/19 Joachim Breitner :
> if Michael Snoyman’s stackage will fly, I’d that would be a good
> candidate for a default set.
+10
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
> I see that the comments are from years ago. Are there any ongoing efforts
> to expand the default search set? (Or alternatively, to implement the
> +hackage modifier mentioned.)
It's actually implemented as +nameOfLibrary. Hoogling for "rstrip +missingh"
gives:
rstrip :: String -> String
Missin
> Hayoo has them all [ .. ]
but Hoogle is better with types?
it seems Hayoo only does exact (string?) match on types,
while Hoogle also knows about polymorphisms, permutations etc.
E.g., search for "String -> Int".
Hoogle finds length :: [a]-> Int as well,
I think Hayoo doesn't.
J.W.
__
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2012, 12:28 -0500 schrieb Radical:
> I see that the comments are from years ago. Are there any ongoing
> efforts to expand the default search set?
if Michael Snoyman’s stackage will fly, I’d that would be a good
candidate for a default set.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Jo
http://holumbus.fh-wedel.de/hayoo/hayoo.html
2012/12/19 Alberto G. Corona
> Hayoo has them all:
>
>
>
> 2012/12/19 Radical
>
>> Thanks, Petr.
>>
>> I see that the comments are from years ago. Are there any ongoing efforts
>> to expand the default search set? (Or alternatively, to implement the
Hayoo has them all:
2012/12/19 Radical
> Thanks, Petr.
>
> I see that the comments are from years ago. Are there any ongoing efforts
> to expand the default search set? (Or alternatively, to implement the
> +hackage modifier mentioned.)
>
> Is there interest in either of these things happening
Thanks, Petr.
I see that the comments are from years ago. Are there any ongoing efforts
to expand the default search set? (Or alternatively, to implement the
+hackage modifier mentioned.)
Is there interest in either of these things happening?
Alvaro
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Petr P
Hi Alvaro,
by default Hoogle only searches some standard set of packages, which is
only a relatively small subset of all Hackage content. From
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Hoogle#Scope_of_Web_Searches :
> Using the standard web interface, Hoogle searches: array, arrows, base,
bytestring,
Searching Hoogle for symbols like `rstrip` or `lstrip` produces "No
results found" for me, even though they exist in the MissingH library.
To wit:
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/MissingH/1.2.0.0/doc/html/Data-String-Utils.html
Is this behavior intentional, or a regression of some sor
11 matches
Mail list logo
