Martin Drautzburg writes:
> If I have a function, say "compute" whose last parameter is some value ...
> and I create another function, which applies "compute" to a list of values,
> how would I call this function?
If I understand you correctly, and it's not simply "map . compute" (which
I'd le
If the function is changing the size of the list (e.g. by removing
duplicates) a name implying 'mapping' might be misleading.
Maybe something like /process/ or /normalize/
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mail
On Jun 6, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Martin Drautzburg wrote:
If I have a function, say "compute" whose last parameter is some
value ...
and I create another function, which applies "compute" to a list of
values,
how would I call this function?
computeF is my natural inclination. F is for Functo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 6, 2010, at 14:22 , Martin Drautzburg wrote:
If I have a function, say "compute" whose last parameter is some
value ...
and I create another function, which applies "compute" to a list of
values,
how would I call this function?
The few c
Hello all,
I like some of the naming conventions in haskell quite a lot, like calling a
list of something "xs", or function which takes a function as a
parameter "..By" as in sortBy or groupBy.
If I have a function, say "compute" whose last parameter is some value ...
and I create another funct
