Malcolm Wallace wrote:
Lennart writes:
What encoding(s) did hbc allow in source files? The docs only mention
unicode characters inside character & string literals.
The Java encoding, i.e., \u.
Well, in that case, nhc98 also supports Unicode in source files,
identically to hbc.
Well, you have
"Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> - Can the Char type hold the full range of Unicode characters?
> >>This has been true in GHC for some time, and is now true in Hugs.
> >>I don't think it's true in nhc98 (please correct me if I'm wrong).
> >
> > You're wrong :-). nhc98 has
Simon Marlow wrote:
Many years ago, hbc claimed to be the only compiler with support for
this.
What encoding(s) did hbc allow in source files? The docs only mention
unicode characters inside character & string literals.
The Java encoding, i.e., \u.
-- Lennart
On 07 January 2005 12:30, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
> "Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Here's a summary of the state of Unicode support in GHC and other
>> compilers. There are several aspects:
>>
>> - Can the Char type hold the full range of Unicode characters?
>>This has been
