Here is another approach of questionable classification of languages. :-)
A lazy functional program is demand driven, an imperative program is
supply driven. That is, if I request some information by calling a
function in GHCi or Hugs, the interpreter develops a plan a how to produce
the
This is certainly proof that you can abuse economics in any context!
;) Or perhaps that economics can be used to abuse anything...
- Johan Tibell
On 10/12/06, Henning Thielemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is another approach of questionable classification of languages. :-)
A lazy
Henning Thielemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is another approach of questionable classification of languages. :-)
A lazy functional program is demand driven, an imperative program is
supply driven.
So is Haskell a Keynesian language and C++ a Say language?
Great, now we can talk
I prefer the terms awesome and crappy, respectively, but sure, whatever
works for you ;-)
Mike
Henning Thielemann wrote:
Here is another approach of questionable classification of languages. :-)
A lazy functional program is demand driven, an imperative program is
supply driven. That is, if
It often seems to me that the Wildeian dichotomy of charming vs.
tedious applies especially well to programming languages.
On Oct 12, 2006, at 5:02 PM, mvanier wrote:
I prefer the terms awesome and crappy, respectively, but sure,
whatever works for you ;-)
Mike
