On 23 Jan 2011, at 18:19, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 18:42 +0100, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
It probably is portable, but I'd think only GHC has all the necessary
extensions.
I imagine some parts (idiom brackets) works with minimal amount of
extentions - maybe it would be b
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 18:42 +0100, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
> It probably is portable, but I'd think only GHC has all the necessary
> extensions.
I imagine some parts (idiom brackets) works with minimal amount of
extentions - maybe it would be benefitial to have instructions to run
SHE with other
On 23 Jan 2011, at 11:27, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
It may be strange question but:
- Is SHE portable (assuming that the compiler have the extensions)?
I have no idea.
- If yes why there is only information how to use it with GHC?
I'm lucky I even know how to get it to work with GHC.
It'd
It probably is portable, but I'd think only GHC has all the necessary
extensions.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
> It may be strange question but:
>
> - Is SHE portable (assuming that the compiler have the extensions)?
> - If yes why there is only information how to u
It may be strange question but:
- Is SHE portable (assuming that the compiler have the extensions)?
- If yes why there is only information how to use it with GHC?
Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Haskell