Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is SHE (the Strathclyde Haskell Enhancement) portable?

2011-01-23 Thread Conor McBride
On 23 Jan 2011, at 18:19, Maciej Piechotka wrote: On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 18:42 +0100, Lennart Augustsson wrote: It probably is portable, but I'd think only GHC has all the necessary extensions. I imagine some parts (idiom brackets) works with minimal amount of extentions - maybe it would be b

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is SHE (the Strathclyde Haskell Enhancement) portable?

2011-01-23 Thread Maciej Piechotka
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 18:42 +0100, Lennart Augustsson wrote: > It probably is portable, but I'd think only GHC has all the necessary > extensions. I imagine some parts (idiom brackets) works with minimal amount of extentions - maybe it would be benefitial to have instructions to run SHE with other

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is SHE (the Strathclyde Haskell Enhancement) portable?

2011-01-23 Thread Conor McBride
On 23 Jan 2011, at 11:27, Maciej Piechotka wrote: It may be strange question but: - Is SHE portable (assuming that the compiler have the extensions)? I have no idea. - If yes why there is only information how to use it with GHC? I'm lucky I even know how to get it to work with GHC. It'd

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is SHE (the Strathclyde Haskell Enhancement) portable?

2011-01-23 Thread Lennart Augustsson
It probably is portable, but I'd think only GHC has all the necessary extensions. On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Maciej Piechotka wrote: > It may be strange question but: > > - Is SHE portable (assuming that the compiler have the extensions)? > - If yes why there is only information how to u

[Haskell-cafe] Is SHE (the Strathclyde Haskell Enhancement) portable?

2011-01-23 Thread Maciej Piechotka
It may be strange question but: - Is SHE portable (assuming that the compiler have the extensions)? - If yes why there is only information how to use it with GHC? Regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Haskell