On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Christopher Done
chrisd...@googlemail.comwrote:
On 18 August 2010 01:30, John Meacham j...@repetae.net wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:38:53PM +0200, Christopher Done wrote:
2. Not really interested in maintaining, but in a good state and
probably worth
On 18 August 2010 01:30, John Meacham j...@repetae.net wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:38:53PM +0200, Christopher Done wrote:
2. Not really interested in maintaining, but in a good state and
probably worth maintaining:
pappy (Bryan Ford gave me permission to upload and for someone to
Hi,
I thought I'd go through my uploaded Hackage packages and decide which
ones I am going to maintain, which are worth others maintaining, and
which are probably not worth maintaining (spoiler, most aren't).
1. Interested in and will continue maintaining:
gd, higherorder, cgi-utils, fastcgi,
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Christopher Done
chrisd...@googlemail.com wrote:
1. Interested in and will continue maintaining:
gd, higherorder, cgi-utils, fastcgi, ircbouncer
Just out of curiosity, why do you use gd instead of cairo?
Cheers! =)
--
Felipe.
I've never used the cairo library as it was part of gtk2hs and thus
not on Hackage. Looks like it's on Hackage now as of last may. I'll
take a look next time I want to do graphics. I imagine it's faster.
On 17 August 2010 23:48, Felipe Lessa felipe.le...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:38:53PM +0200, Christopher Done wrote:
2. Not really interested in maintaining, but in a good state and
probably worth maintaining:
pappy (Bryan Ford gave me permission to upload and for someone to maintain
this)
I actually have been actively developing and
