Casey McCann schrieb:
> One drastic approach I've used in personal libraries--operator-heavy
> EDSLs specifically--is to define everything first with alphanumeric
> names, then put operators in their own modules. In some cases I'd have
> three such modules: One providing a minimal set of operators
One drastic approach I've used in personal libraries--operator-heavy EDSLs
specifically--is to define everything first with alphanumeric names, then
put operators in their own modules. In some cases I'd have three such
modules: One providing a minimal set of operators that don't clash with
anything
Hi Ivan
empty is fine as is, obviously with a Monoid instance as well, people
can choose to use mempty which removes potential name clashes.
I was thinking of (<$>) and (<+>), though I was forgetting that (<+>)
is actually ArrowPlus.
If you are mostly gifting angles as notation to Applicative, m
(Changing the subject as it's going off-topic from the original email :p)
On 25 May 2011 22:45, Simon Meier wrote:
> 2011/5/25 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic :
>>
>> Also, by clashes with Applicative, are you referring to empty and <$>
>> ? I'm not sure if a better name than "empty" can be found; as for
