On Feb 17, 2010, at 2:26 AM, Ozgur Akgun wrote:
Wikipedia claims in short that "Year Zero is the year before 1 A.D.
used in astronomical calculations.".
In full: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_zero
Seems like no calendar, other than astronomical things include it
That's not what that pa
On 17 February 2010 01:26, Martijn van Steenbergen
wrote:
> Ivan Miljenovic wrote:
>>
>> On 16 February 2010 08:35, Don Stewart wrote:
>>>
>>> Enjoy the new decade of flexible, fusible, fast arrays for Haskell!
>>
>> /me points out that 2010 is actually the last year of the decade, and
>> not the
Ivan Miljenovic wrote:
On 16 February 2010 08:35, Don Stewart wrote:
Enjoy the new decade of flexible, fusible, fast arrays for Haskell!
/me points out that 2010 is actually the last year of the decade, and
not the first year of a new decade...
There certainly is /a/ decade that starts toda
Wikipedia claims in short that "Year Zero is the year before 1 A.D. used in
astronomical calculations.".
In full: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_zero
Seems like no calendar, other than astronomical things include it.
On 16 February 2010 04:32, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
>
> On Feb 16, 2010, at
On Feb 16, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Ivan Miljenovic wrote:
On 16 February 2010 14:45, Don Stewart wrote:
ivan.miljenovic:
On 16 February 2010 08:35, Don Stewart wrote:
Enjoy the new decade of flexible, fusible, fast arrays for Haskell!
/me points out that 2010 is actually the last year of the d
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Ivan Miljenovic
wrote:
> On 16 February 2010 08:35, Don Stewart wrote:
>> Enjoy the new decade of flexible, fusible, fast arrays for Haskell!
>
> /me points out that 2010 is actually the last year of the decade, and
> not the first year of a new decade...
Hm, I'm
On 16 February 2010 14:45, Don Stewart wrote:
> ivan.miljenovic:
>> On 16 February 2010 08:35, Don Stewart wrote:
>> > Enjoy the new decade of flexible, fusible, fast arrays for Haskell!
>>
>> /me points out that 2010 is actually the last year of the decade, and
>> not the first year of a new dec
ivan.miljenovic:
> On 16 February 2010 08:35, Don Stewart wrote:
> > Enjoy the new decade of flexible, fusible, fast arrays for Haskell!
>
> /me points out that 2010 is actually the last year of the decade, and
> not the first year of a new decade...
Computer scientists count from zero. :-)
--
On 16 February 2010 08:35, Don Stewart wrote:
> Enjoy the new decade of flexible, fusible, fast arrays for Haskell!
/me points out that 2010 is actually the last year of the decade, and
not the first year of a new decade...
;-)
--
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.
creswick:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> > And I'll take this opportunity to declare that uvector is now in
> > official maintainance-only mode.
>
> Would it make sense to add a note to that effect to the package
> description / cabal file, so it shows up on hackage? ('
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> And I'll take this opportunity to declare that uvector is now in
> official maintainance-only mode.
Would it make sense to add a note to that effect to the package
description / cabal file, so it shows up on hackage? ('Stability:
Experimenta
Don Stewart wrote:
Enjoy the new decade of flexible, fusible, fast arrays for Haskell!
More interesting might be a post on how to migrate from Data.Array to
vector; it's news to me that any of these post-Haskell98 array libraries
are production-ready yet.
(And while we're on the subject,
I've summarised my notes on how to migrate array code from the uvector
package to Roman's vector package:
http://donsbot.wordpress.com/2010/02/15/migrating-from-uvector-to-vector/
And I'll take this opportunity to declare that uvector is now in
official maintainance-only mode.
Enjoy the new
13 matches
Mail list logo
