Re: [Haskell-cafe] Ordering vs. Order

2010-10-08 Thread Jeff Wheeler
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Steve Schafer wrote: > I think the reason for this conceptual distinction can be traced to the > derivation of "ordering" as the gerund form of the verb "order," in that > it implies that an action has occurred (or is still occurring). Reading the original message

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Ordering vs. Order

2010-10-08 Thread Alexander Solla
On Oct 7, 2010, at 1:15 AM, Alexander Solla wrote: For example, a set with three elements can be ordered in three different ways. Six ways. I hate making such basic math mistakes. ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.h

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Ordering vs. Order

2010-10-08 Thread Brandon S Allbery KF8NH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/7/10 04:02 , Christian Sternagel wrote: > However, I do know that there are many publications about "ordered > structures" which use the word "ordering" (most of which I'm aware of, not > by native speakers). Like most things in Haskell, it's na

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Ordering vs. Order

2010-10-08 Thread wren ng thornton
On 10/7/10 8:35 AM, Ketil Malde wrote: Christian Sternagel writes: recently I was wondering about the two words "order" and "ordering" I would use "ordering" to mean the relation or function that orders (ranks) elements, and I'd use "order" to refer the actual progression. So by applying an o

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Ordering vs. Order

2010-10-07 Thread Steve Schafer
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:02:20 +0200, you wrote: >I'm not a native English speaker and recently I was wondering about the >two words "order" and "ordering" (the main reason why I write this to >the Haskell mailing list, is that the type class "Ordering" does exist). > >My dictionaries tell me that

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Ordering vs. Order

2010-10-07 Thread Ketil Malde
Christian Sternagel writes: > recently I was wondering about the two words "order" and "ordering" I would use "ordering" to mean the relation or function that orders (ranks) elements, and I'd use "order" to refer the actual progression. So by applying an ordering, you get elements in a particula

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Ordering vs. Order

2010-10-07 Thread Stefan Holdermans
Chris, > I'm not a native English speaker and recently I was wondering about the two > words "order" and "ordering" (the main reason why I write this to the Haskell > mailing list, is that the type class "Ordering" does exist). Irrelevant to your struggle, but note that the *type class* is dubb

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Ordering vs. Order

2010-10-07 Thread Alexander Solla
On Oct 7, 2010, at 1:02 AM, Christian Sternagel wrote: Hi all, I'm not a native English speaker and recently I was wondering about the two words "order" and "ordering" (the main reason why I write this to the Haskell mailing list, is that the type class "Ordering" does exist). My dicti

[Haskell-cafe] Ordering vs. Order

2010-10-07 Thread Christian Sternagel
Hi all, I'm not a native English speaker and recently I was wondering about the two words "order" and "ordering" (the main reason why I write this to the Haskell mailing list, is that the type class "Ordering" does exist). My dictionaries tell me that "order" (besides other meanings) denotes