Hi again,
I posted a bunch of questions on profiling here a few days back, but
couldn't tickle anybody to post a reply. Since I am not tired any
more today, but still can't understand the documentation, or the
output of the profiler, here it goes again:
What qualifies as constant applicable
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:31:58PM +0200, Matthias Fischmann wrote:
What qualifies as constant applicable form, and why is it not
labelled in a more informative way?
CAFs are, AIUI, things that are just values (i.e. things that don't take
an argument) that have been floated up to the top
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:59:23PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
To: Matthias Fischmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
From: Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:59:23 +0100
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Profiling CAFs (re-post)
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:31
On 10/10/06, Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:31:58PM +0200, Matthias Fischmann wrote:
What qualifies as constant applicable form, and why is it not
labelled in a more informative way?
CAFs are, AIUI, things that are just values (i.e. things that don't take
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 05:21:52PM +0200, Matthias Fischmann wrote:
Compiling with -caf-all might give you more useful information.
Oops. I thought i had that in my Makefile, but appearently i was
wrong... If I add it, this is what happens:
$ ghc -prof -caf-all Main.hs -o Main # (ghc
