On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 05:21:52PM +0200, Matthias Fischmann wrote:
>
> > Compiling with -caf-all might give you more useful information.
>
> Oops. I thought i had that in my Makefile, but appearently i was
> wrong... If I add it, this is what happens:
>
> $ ghc -prof -caf-all Main.hs -o Main
On 10/10/06, Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:31:58PM +0200, Matthias Fischmann wrote:
>
> What qualifies as constant applicable form, and why is it not
> labelled in a more informative way?
CAFs are, AIUI, things that are just values (i.e. things that don't t
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:59:23PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> To: Matthias Fischmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
> From: Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:59:23 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Profiling CAFs (re-post
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:31:58PM +0200, Matthias Fischmann wrote:
>
> What qualifies as constant applicable form, and why is it not
> labelled in a more informative way?
CAFs are, AIUI, things that are just values (i.e. things that don't take
an argument) that have been floated up to the to
Hi again,
I posted a bunch of questions on profiling here a few days back, but
couldn't tickle anybody to post a reply. Since I am not tired any
more today, but still can't understand the documentation, or the
output of the profiler, here it goes again:
What qualifies as constant applicable
