On 1/5/06, Scherrer, Chad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting. Have there been any performance comparisons vs GHC et al?
Yes:
http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~mfn/hacle/index.html#fin
http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~mfn/hacle/eval.html
___
Haskell-
l [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 1:58 PM
> To: Scherrer, Chad
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; haskell-cafe@haskell.org
> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] RE: Haskell vs. Clean
>
> Hi
>
> > My knowledge of Clean is fairly limited
> Mine too, but one o
Hi
> My knowledge of Clean is fairly limited
Mine too, but one of the biggest differences is that Clean has
uniqueness types instead of Monads.
They are in fact so similar that you can convert between them, using
Hacle: http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~mfn/hacle/
I believe also that Clean has a l
Daniel,
My knowledge of Clean is fairly limited (even more so than my knowledge
of Haskell), but no one seems to be responding to this, so I'll take a
crack at it. Here is why I've stuck with Haskell instead of Clean:
1. It runs well on Linux
2. The license is more open
3. There is a (comparative
