ithika:
> Quoth Conrad Parker, nevermore,
> >
> > Besides, If it's not open source, it's not computer
> > science. Science demands repeatable results, computer science
> > demands literate programming. The solution is not to shy away from
> > including code, or else the IP lawyers have won, scienc
Quoth Conrad Parker, nevermore,
>
> Besides, If it's not open source, it's not computer
> science. Science demands repeatable results, computer science
> demands literate programming. The solution is not to shy away from
> including code, or else the IP lawyers have won, science is banned and
> we
On 13/03/07, Wolfgang Jeltsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Montag, 12. März 2007 03:52 schrieb Donald Bruce Stewart:
> * [41]Why Publish CS Papers Without Code?
> 41. http://billmill.org/why_no_code
Interesting!
This leads me to the question how copyright of code fragments included in
con
