On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:54:08PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
> On 08 December 2005 18:21, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
> > It suddenly occurs to me that there are other projects in CVS
> > that have not yet been converted to darcs, e.g. Hugs98 and nhc98.
> > Are there plans to do so? If not, then since
On 08 December 2005 18:21, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
>> http://cvs.haskell.org/darcs/ghc
>> http://cvs.haskell.org/darcs/libraries
>
> It suddenly occurs to me that there are other projects in CVS
> that have not yet been converted to darcs, e.g. Hugs98 and nhc98.
> Are there plans to do so? If not
Am Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2005 16:56 schrieb John Goerzen:
> [...]
> I have never worked much with these web front-ends. My understanding is
> that Trac is probably not the most efficient front-end to darcs, as it
> tries to put things in a more svn-like model. I wonder if one of the
> other fr
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:20:43AM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Certainly performance of the --partial tree seems good enough, though I
> don't like that I can't see the history for individual files. I can't
Just to clarify, that limitation exists only when using --partial.
One thing we could do
On 07 December 2005 13:06, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 11:02:29AM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
>>> Also please note that these repos are READ ONLY for now. Nobody
>>> will be accepting darcs patches until Simon (or someone) gives the
>>> word.
>>
>> When that does happen, it'd
