At 19:29 17/02/04 -0500, S. Alexander Jacobson wrote:
Thank you for the link to FGL. I also looked at the boilerplate stuff. If *feels* like there should be a way to embed the graph stuff in the boilerplate stuff to allow non-destructive update of arbitrary object graphs without handcoding the mapping of the datastructure to an object graph?
Is this possible? Has anyone does this? Any reason to believe its a bad idea?
Alternatively, I could decide up front to represent my data as RDF triples (amenable to a graph system), but I'd rather take advantage of Haskell's type system.
Hmmm (speaking as an RDF advocate) ... that seems like an odd reason for using RDF.
Much of the value of RDF is, I would say, as means to exchange information *between* programs rather than for internal structuring of data. An RDF-graph-based interface to data provides for some uniformity of access and processing that can be useful. In my own work, I have at least two different internal representations for RDF data (neither of which have been designed for efficiency).
#g
------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
