On Sat, 10 Dec 2005, Daniel Fischer wrote:
Am Samstag, 10. Dezember 2005 15:34 schrieben Sie:
On 12/10/05, Daniel Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's probably because Lemmih's is polymorphic.
Didn't Henning Thielemann write it?
--
Friendly,
Lemmih
I thought, Henning Thielemann =
On 10/12/05, Daniel Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 10. Dezember 2005 15:34 schrieben Sie:
> > On 12/10/05, Daniel Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > That's probably because Lemmih's is polymorphic.
> >
> > Didn't Henning Thielemann write it?
> >
> > --
> > Friendly,
> >
Am Samstag, 10. Dezember 2005 15:34 schrieben Sie:
> On 12/10/05, Daniel Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's probably because Lemmih's is polymorphic.
>
> Didn't Henning Thielemann write it?
>
> --
> Friendly,
> Lemmih
I thought, Henning Thielemann == Lemmih.
If I'm wrong, I apologize
From: Daniel Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Branimir Maksimovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Subject: Re: Differences in optimisiation with interactive and compiled mo
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:11:31 +0100
Am Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2005 19:17 schrieb Branimir Maksimovi
On 12/10/05, Daniel Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2005 19:17 schrieb Branimir Maksimovic:
> > From: Henning Thielemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > >To: Branimir Maksimovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >CC: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
> > >Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Differ
Am Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2005 19:17 schrieb Branimir Maksimovic:
> From: Henning Thielemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >To: Branimir Maksimovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
> >Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Differences in optimisiation with interactive
> >and compiled mode
> >Dat
From: Daniel Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Branimir Maksimovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Subject: Re: Differences in optimisiation with interactive and compiled mo
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 23:27:00 +0100
Still doesn't work, though:
*Main> searchr "hahal" "jupp" "hahah
Still doesn't work, though:
*Main> searchr "hahal" "jupp" "hahahalala"
"hahahalala"
The problem is that the string to replace may contain a repeated pattern
and the pattern that begins the actual occurence might be consumed before a
failure is detected.
And is
*Main> searchr "bla" "" "remove bla
