| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
| Thiago Arrais
| Sent: 08 June 2006 20:07
| To: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Editors for Haskell
|
| Imam,
|
| On 6/8/06, Imam Tashdid ul Alam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imam,
On 6/8/06, Imam Tashdid ul Alam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- about formatted error messages (I am sure you guys
don't care), could someone build a light GHC front end
that given a .hs/.lhs file produces two XML files with
specified DTD, the parsed structure and the error
messages?
I wo
Hi
- about formatted error messages (I am sure you guys
don't care), could someone build a light GHC front end
that given a .hs/.lhs file produces two XML files with
specified DTD, the parsed structure and the error
messages? the reason for choosing XML is that not only
the Java people (includ
hya
this topic is hot, and I wonder why :s
well, I've been thinking, the EclipseFP people have
done more or less a fine job (I'm trying their "live"
build, things feel natural).
but the problem is, to build something like EclipseFP
you have to know both Java and Haskell and on top of
that you ha
| > You probably know this, but your kind of application is a big reason
| > that we now make GHC available as a library. (Just say 'import
GHC'.)
| >
| > You shouldn't need to parse Haskell yourself: just call GHC's
parser.
| > You get back a syntax tree with very precise location information
tha
Pete Kazmier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As part of my learning experience, I think I want to see if I can
> write a haskell pastebin that does proper syntax highlighting.
> Someone in #haskell suggested that I use just a lexer because using a
> parser is overkill. However, I can't make this as
Pete Kazmier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As part of my learning experience, I think I want to see if I can
> write a haskell pastebin that does proper syntax highlighting.
> Someone in #haskell suggested that I use just a lexer because using a
> parser is overkill. However, I can't make this ass
Hi Pete
As part of my learning experience, I think I want to see if I can
write a haskell pastebin that does proper syntax highlighting.
Someone in #haskell suggested that I use just a lexer because using a
parser is overkill. However, I can't make this assessment until I see
how to use the par
"Simon Peyton-Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You probably know this, but your kind of application is a big reason
> that we now make GHC available as a library. (Just say 'import GHC'.)
>
> You shouldn't need to parse Haskell yourself: just call GHC's parser.
> You get back a syntax tree
One might want to take a look at:
http://www.cs.uu.nl/research/projects/proxima/
where we have built (a.o.) an editing environment for Helium programs
(a subset of Haskell),
Doaitse
On 2006 jun 02, at 10:57, Brian Hulley wrote:
Simon Marlow wrote:
Malcolm Wallace wrote:
"Brian Hul
Simon Marlow wrote:
Malcolm Wallace wrote:
"Brian Hulley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. Although there is still a problem with
the fact that var, qvar, qcon etc is in the context free syntax
instead of the lexical syntax so you could write:
2 `plus
Malcolm Wallace wrote:
"Brian Hulley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. Although there is still a problem with
the fact that var, qvar, qcon etc is in the context free syntax
instead of the lexical syntax so you could write:
2 `plus ` 4
(Pre
"Brian Hulley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out. Although there is still a problem with
> the fact that var, qvar, qcon etc is in the context free syntax
> instead of the lexical syntax so you could write:
>
> 2 `plus ` 4
> (Prelude.+
>
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Brian Hulley wrote:
Another thing which causes difficulty is the use of qualified
operators, and the fact that the qualification syntax is in the
context free grammar instead of being kept in the lexical syntax
(where I think it belongs).
You are in luck, because accor
Brian Hulley wrote:
Another thing which causes difficulty is the use of qualified operators,
and the fact that the qualification syntax is in the context free
grammar instead of being kept in the lexical syntax (where I think it
belongs).
You are in luck, because according to the Haskell 9
Thomas Davie wrote:
When working on Macs I've found SubEthaEdit to be by far the best
Haskell editor, emailing the guy tends to have quite good results in
terms of getting it free if you say you're involved in education.
Although I do hope that some people choose to pay for the software so tha
On May 25, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote:
Hi Walt,
I'm using Haskell (GHC and Hugs) on several different platforms.
Windows, OS X and Linux systems.
Assuming that you want your students to be able to use any of the
above platforms, the only options I know of which work well on a
Hi Walt,
I'm using Haskell (GHC and Hugs) on several different platforms.
Windows, OS X and Linux systems.
Assuming that you want your students to be able to use any of the
above platforms, the only options I know of which work well on all of
the platforms are Emacsen, Vim, hIDE, Eclipse and J
18 matches
Mail list logo
