[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haddock Problem

2010-06-24 Thread Dominic Steinitz
> Does anyone have any suggestions or do I have to start building haddock myself? Ok I built it from source rather than using the Haskell Platform exe and it now works. Perhaps the packager of the Haskell Platform for Windows could take a look at why the binary is behaving as it does? Dominic.

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haddock Problem

2010-06-22 Thread Dominic Steinitz
malcolm.wallace me.com> writes: > > I haven't been following closely, but how did you install haddock? From a binary dist? Is it possible that > one of the Windows binary dists has a "baked-in" location for something on the E: drive, which existed on > the packager's machine but not on the f

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haddock Problem

2010-06-15 Thread David Waern
2010/6/15 David Waern : > 2010/6/15 Dominic Steinitz : >> David Waern gmail.com> writes: >> >>> I think using --optghc=-package-conf is the correct way to point to >>> another package DB, so I'll look into why it doesn't work. >> >> Perhaps another line of attack would be to see why haddock thinks

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haddock Problem

2010-06-15 Thread David Waern
2010/6/15 Dominic Steinitz : > David Waern gmail.com> writes: > >> I think using --optghc=-package-conf is the correct way to point to >> another package DB, so I'll look into why it doesn't work. > > Perhaps another line of attack would be to see why haddock thinks I have > an "E:" drive? Right.

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haddock Problem

2010-06-15 Thread Dominic Steinitz
David Waern gmail.com> writes: > I think using --optghc=-package-conf is the correct way to point to > another package DB, so I'll look into why it doesn't work. Perhaps another line of attack would be to see why haddock thinks I have an "E:" drive? __

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haddock Problem

2010-06-14 Thread David Waern
2010/6/14 Dominic Steinitz : > So I created one and copied our custom package databse into it but still no > luck: > > ..\ThirdParty\Haskell_Platform\2010.1.0.0\bin\haddock.exe -B > c:\p4wksp\steinitd_fpf_exdate_ws\FPF_Dev.br\ThirdParty\haskell_packages > backendc\PAD2C.hs > haddock: internal Hadd

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haddock Problem

2010-06-14 Thread Dominic Steinitz
David Waern gmail.com> writes: > > 2010/6/14 David Waern gmail.com>: > > > > OK, it seems like the path from the ghc-paths package overrided what > > you specified. I'm not sure this will work, but you could try: > > > >  haddock -B c:\p4wksp\steinitd_fpf_exdate_ws\FPF_Dev.br\ThirdParty\haskel

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haddock Problem

2010-06-14 Thread David Waern
2010/6/14 David Waern : > > OK, it seems like the path from the ghc-paths package overrided what > you specified. I'm not sure this will work, but you could try: > >  haddock -B > c:\p4wksp\steinitd_fpf_exdate_ws\FPF_Dev.br\ThirdParty\haskell_packages\fpf.package.conf Sorry, that should be had

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haddock Problem

2010-06-14 Thread David Waern
2010/6/14 Dominic Steinitz : >> Try "--optghc=-package-conf --optghc=", to point Haddock at the custom > DB. > > Hi David, Thanks for the quick response. No dice I am afraid. Dominic. BTW > this > (using optghc) used to work on previous versions of haddock (iirc 2.4 and > 2.5). > > ..\ThirdParty\

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haddock Problem

2010-06-14 Thread Dominic Steinitz
> Try "--optghc=-package-conf --optghc=", to point Haddock at the custom DB. Hi David, Thanks for the quick response. No dice I am afraid. Dominic. BTW this (using optghc) used to work on previous versions of haddock (iirc 2.4 and 2.5). ..\ThirdParty\Haskell_Platform\2010.1.0.0\bin\haddock.exe