This is interesting. I am always looking for new ideas in GUI design.
Could you elaborate on this? Do you have examples of where this has
been successful?
Successful: quantitative finance and trading.
Productive: unifying and scaling up from simple tools
-Andrzej
__
DSL
> shold be user-specific
> knoledge discovery (bidirectionally)though transferable as skill.
This is interesting. I am always looking for new ideas in GUI design.
Could you elaborate on this? Do you have examples of where this has
been successful?
-deech
___
aditya siram wrote:
And a badly-designed DSL is also
everybody's worst enemy.
Also a traditional GUI is discoverable without a user-manual.
I am glad you mentioned that. Perhaps I did not emphasised enough that DSL shold be user-specific
knoledge discovery (bidirectionally)though transferable
> (3) conceptually rich DSL is your best friend as human-computer interface.
I agree that a well-designed DSL is *my* best friend but I suspect it
would be my grandma's worst enemy. And a badly-designed DSL is also
everybody's worst enemy.
Also a traditional GUI is discoverable without a user-manu
Hello Wisecrackers,
Cannot resist shering with you my perspective.
Computer is a logic device and logic builds complexity bottom up while graphics
builds it top down.
They are therefore antagonistic by nature and in the single case of their
glorious interplay - The
Euclidean Geometry - it block
On 04/02/2010 10:15 PM, Dominic Espinosa wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 06:11:52PM +0100, Stephen Tetley wrote:
On 2 April 2010 17:53, Dominic Espinosa wrote:
I ended up rewriting it in another language (due to time
pressure) and I'm a little wary of attempting to use Haskell again for
develo
Rafael Cunha de Almeida wrote:
> When using haskell, can't you just make a static binary on MacOS and Windows,
> though? Why wouldn't that work?
On MacOS, you would have to relocate the shared gtk2hs libraries and
bundle them with the application. It's actually easiest to exorcise the
paths from t
Thomas Schilling wrote:
> Haskeller's certainly aren't GUI-haters! It's just difficult in
> general to write cross-platform GUIs. The goal *is* to put gtk2hs
> into the platform, but in order to do that, it needs to be buildable
> using Cabal. The limiting factor is time, not motivation.
Well,
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> David Leimbach wrote:
>> Having said that, are there any plans to make it really easy to get
>> gtk2hs working on Mac OS X?
>
>
> It's in MacPorts.
Which doesn't necessarily make it easier. Took me 2 full days to install
gtk and it's still crashing a lot more th
This may not be helpful for you, but when I did GUI stuff with haskell
I wrote the GUI part in c++ with fltk, exposed a medium-level api
specific to that gui, and then call that api through the FFI. This is
sort of like the web browser + backend thing, except switch c++ and
fltk for javascript and
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 06:11:52PM +0100, Stephen Tetley wrote:
> On 2 April 2010 17:53, Dominic Espinosa wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
>
> > I ended up rewriting it in another language (due to time
> > pressure) and I'm a little wary of attempting to use Haskell again for
> > developing such an application
On 2 Apr 2010, at 21:01, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2010, at 15:21 , Thomas Schilling wrote:
>> On 2 April 2010 20:15, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
>>> On Apr 2, 2010, at 10:41 , David Leimbach wrote:
>>> Having said that, are there any plans to make it really easy to get gtk
On Apr 2, 2010, at 15:21 , Thomas Schilling wrote:
On 2 April 2010 20:15, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
wrote:
On Apr 2, 2010, at 10:41 , David Leimbach wrote:
Having said that, are there any plans to make it really easy to get
gtk2hs
working on Mac OS X?
It's in MacPorts.
But that's the vari
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Anthony Cowley wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Dominic Espinosa
> wrote:
> > Is there a general strategy for deploying Haskell apps, graphical or no,
> > to MacOS X and/or Windows? I'm especially interested in cases where the
> > application uses some he
On Apr 2, 2010, at 15:21 , Thomas Schilling wrote:
On 2 April 2010 20:15, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
wrote:
On Apr 2, 2010, at 10:41 , David Leimbach wrote:
Having said that, are there any plans to make it really easy to get
gtk2hs
working on Mac OS X?
It's in MacPorts.
But that's the vari
On 2 April 2010 20:15, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2010, at 10:41 , David Leimbach wrote:
>
> Having said that, are there any plans to make it really easy to get gtk2hs
> working on Mac OS X?
>
> It's in MacPorts.
But that's the variant using X11, no? There now is a Gtk+ framewor
On Apr 2, 2010, at 10:41 , David Leimbach wrote:
Having said that, are there any plans to make it really easy to get
gtk2hs working on Mac OS X?
It's in MacPorts.
--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allb...@kf8nh.com
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats]
Stephen Tetley disse:
> On 2 April 2010 17:53, Dominic Espinosa wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
>
>> I ended up rewriting it in another language (due to time
>> pressure) and I'm a little wary of attempting to use Haskell again for
>> developing such an application.
>
> Hi Dominic
>
> Out of curiosity what lan
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Dominic Espinosa wrote:
> Is there a general strategy for deploying Haskell apps, graphical or no,
> to MacOS X and/or Windows? I'm especially interested in cases where the
> application uses some heavyweight libraries like OpenGL.
I have a GUI app that I deploy o
On 2 April 2010 17:53, Dominic Espinosa wrote:
[SNIP]
> I ended up rewriting it in another language (due to time
> pressure) and I'm a little wary of attempting to use Haskell again for
> developing such an application.
Hi Dominic
Out of curiosity what language did you choose instead?
Each ti
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 07:41:38AM -0700, David Leimbach wrote:
>Having said that, are there any plans to make it really easy to get gtk2hs
>working on Mac OS X?
I think this is an important issue in developing run-of-the-mill GUI
apps in Haskell. I recently wrote a small application using
Never been a fan of GTK myself, but that's because I was a KDE developer I
guess :-).
Having said that, are there any plans to make it really easy to get gtk2hs
working on Mac OS X?
Dave
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Andy Stewart wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> For GHC-6.12, just darcs version suppor
Hi Jürgen,
For GHC-6.12, just darcs version support.
So please download darcs version.
Axel has working on that make gtk2hs build on cabal.
And i'm working on update All gtk2hs API to Gtk+ 2.18.3 (have finish
99%), i can finish all APIs in later days.
Axel have finish some sub-modules on http:
23 matches
Mail list logo
