Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Hidden module?

2009-03-02 Thread John Meacham
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 11:03:41PM +, Duncan Coutts wrote: > > They serve different purposes, hsc2hs is meant to run on the actual > > machine the library is being _built_ _for_ to obtain information that is > > only available on the final build architecture/operating system. as in, > > an hsc

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Hidden module?

2009-03-01 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 13:08 -0800, John Meacham wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:53:28PM +0100, Achim Schneider wrote: > > Cristiano Paris wrote: > > > > > I had to append process and directory as dependencies but then it > > > worked. How can I submit a patch to Hackage? Do I have to contact

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Hidden module?

2009-03-01 Thread John Meacham
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:53:28PM +0100, Achim Schneider wrote: > Cristiano Paris wrote: > > > I had to append process and directory as dependencies but then it > > worked. How can I submit a patch to Hackage? Do I have to contact the > > owner? > > > In general, just try the maintainer and/or a

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Hidden module?

2009-02-28 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 21:53 +0100, Achim Schneider wrote: > Cristiano Paris wrote: > > > I had to append process and directory as dependencies but then it > > worked. How can I submit a patch to Hackage? Do I have to contact the > > owner? > > > In general, just try the maintainer and/or author a

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Hidden module?

2009-02-27 Thread Achim Schneider
Cristiano Paris wrote: > I had to append process and directory as dependencies but then it > worked. How can I submit a patch to Hackage? Do I have to contact the > owner? > In general, just try the maintainer and/or author adresses given on hsc2hs's hackage page. I'd advice you to switch over t