On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:02:21 -0700, you wrote:
>I imagine someone looking at a lovely app and saying, "Wow -- great
>interface! I bet it was programmed in Haskell."
While I can agree with the sentiment...well, good luck with that. ;-)
-Steve Schafer
__
For another model of GUIs, see Tangible Values (
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/TV), which is composable MVC.
And amen to targeting GPUs.
In addition to getting clunky, imperative GUI frameworks like wx & gtk
working robustly and easily in Haskell across platforms, I'd love to see
more powerf
Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
Regarding GUIs, I really miss a pure functional framework for doing so.
We all do, we all do. ;)
Currently I'm using Microsoft's WPF, and that is more or less declarative, a
bit like BOOPSI or MUI on the good old Amiga days. But WPF has so many
little quirks, not to m
Vo Minh Thu wrote:
Is it right that by using flattr, you end up donating the same amount
of money to every flattred person in a month?
Yes.
So you can donate more
the previous month to some project you value less than another project
the next month. This seems weird to me.
That's the price
On Oct 2, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
> Regarding GUIs, I really miss a pure functional framework for doing so.
>
> Currently I'm using Microsoft's WPF, and that is more or less declarative, a
> bit like BOOPSI or MUI on the good old Amiga days. But WPF has so many little
> quir
Regarding GUIs, I really miss a pure functional framework for doing so.
Currently I'm using Microsoft's WPF, and that is more or less declarative, a
bit like BOOPSI or MUI on the good old Amiga days. But WPF has so many
little quirks, not to mentioned a weakly typed XML-like language called
"XAML"
2010/10/2 Luke Palmer :
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Bulat Ziganshin
> wrote:
>> Hello Heinrich,
>>
>> Saturday, October 2, 2010, 1:36:48 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> Would you put a flattr button [1] on the wxHaskell page? This way,
>>> people like me would be able to show their appreciation by don
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Bulat Ziganshin
wrote:
> Hello Heinrich,
>
> Saturday, October 2, 2010, 1:36:48 PM, you wrote:
>
>> Would you put a flattr button [1] on the wxHaskell page? This way,
>> people like me would be able to show their appreciation by donating a
>
> this page doesn't desc
Hello Heinrich,
Saturday, October 2, 2010, 1:36:48 PM, you wrote:
> Would you put a flattr button [1] on the wxHaskell page? This way,
> people like me would be able to show their appreciation by donating a
this page doesn't describe how to pay and how to got the money
received. if Jeremy lives
Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote:
Apologies folks, rant coming up...
[...]
Bear in mind that as I have a (very) demanding day job and a young
family, I actually have no more than 3-4 hours a week (at best) to spend
maintaining wxHaskell. Bear in mind also that my interest in wxHaskell
was always to be
Andrew Coppin wrote:
> On 29/09/2010 07:33 PM, Steve Schafer wrote:
>> The issue isn't that there aren't a lot of Windows developers who have
>> an interest in Haskell+GUI development. The issue is that nearly every
>> Windows developer who looks into Haskell+GUI says, "This stuff sucks,"
>> and
11 matches
Mail list logo
