> I believe the following is not indented correctly. It only happens  with
> (x:xs) when you use nested cases, I think.

> case foo of
>    [] ->
>        case bar of
>          [] ->
>              return ()
> (x:xs) ->

Thanks.  The indentation indeed works particularly poorly here in ways that
I hadn't seen yet.  I don't have time to look into right now, but I've added
it to the indent.hs file in the mean time.


        Stefan




_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to