[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donald Bruce Stewart) writes:
> Can't we do something like this, on top of System.Process?
> Do we need unix* stuff anymore?
Hi,
on my computer your code (with >> return ()-s inserted) works with at
most 135168=132*1024 bytes of input:
import System.Exit
import System
jgoerzen:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 04:19:58PM +1100, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
> > > In particular, you seem to be wanting my pipeBoth function.
> > >
> > > Note that your proposed String -> IO String function type is insufficient
> > > because it does not provide a way to evaluate the return v
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, John Goerzen wrote:
> [... re System.Cmd.Utils]
>
> It could go under System.Posix perhaps. It relies quite heavily on
> functionality provided by the unix package and the System.Posix.* tree.
>
> Take a look at the source at:
>
> http://software.complete.org/missingh/brows
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 04:19:58PM +1100, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
> > In particular, you seem to be wanting my pipeBoth function.
> >
> > Note that your proposed String -> IO String function type is insufficient
> > because it does not provide a way to evaluate the return value of the
> > func
jgoerzen:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:52:48 +1100, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
>
> > With the upcoming hackathon[1], and its timely focus on real world
> > libraries, infrastructure and tools support, I've started a list of
> > truly missing libraries, for particular problem domains.
> >
> > If you
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:52:48 +1100, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
> With the upcoming hackathon[1], and its timely focus on real world
> libraries, infrastructure and tools support, I've started a list of
> truly missing libraries, for particular problem domains.
>
> If you have a problem, for whic
