>> Fusing the ws is trickier. Directly appealing to the fibonacci-number
>> example is not recommended because this would mean to keep the last 16
>> ws in memory and shifting them right to left by hand. But as the
>
> Are you saying this because we don't want a 16-tuple?
Exactly.
>> "Alternate
Thanks.
> Fusing the ws is trickier. Directly appealing to the fibonacci-number
> example is not recommended because this would mean to keep the last 16
> ws in memory and shifting them right to left by hand. But as the
Are you saying this because we don't want a 16-tuple?
> "Alternate method of
Dominic Steinitz wrote:
> I have re-written the sha1 code so that it is (hopefully) easy to see that it
> faithfully implements the algorithm (see
> http://www.itl.nist.gov/fipspubs/fip180-1.htm). Having got rid of the space
> leak, I have been trying to improve performance.
>
> Currently, the
