Andy Stewart schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> We plan to release bug fix version : gtk2hs-0.11.1
>
> Please report any bug of gtk2hs-0.11.0, we will fix it before release
> gtk2hs-0.11.1
I'm looking forward for this bug-fix release (since gtk2hs-0.11.0 did
not work for me).
Because I've almost missed thi
writes:
> Short version of this post:
>
> Looks like the intsall depends on alex and that dependencies doesn't
> appear to be handled, i.e. I had to install alex before proceeding.
>
> why do is it called gtk2hs if you are actually installing package
> gtk ;-)
Because before gtk2hs cabalized pack
Short version of this post:
Looks like the intsall depends on alex and that dependencies doesn't
appear to be handled, i.e. I had to install alex before proceeding.
why do is it called gtk2hs if you are actually installing package
gtk ;-)
Where's the demo directory ?!
Moral of the story: don't
On 14 July 2010 14:52, wrote:
> Short version of this post:
>
> Looks like the intsall depends on alex and that dependencies doesn't
> appear to be handled, i.e. I had to install alex before proceeding.
Yes, cabal-install isn't able to cope with the build-tools dependencies.
> why do is it call
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:05:35 +0800
Andy Stewart wrote:
> > Where's the demo directory ?!
> Sorry, we forgot add demo in .cabal file when we released
> gtk2hs-0.11.0, We will include all demos in gtk2hs-0.11.1
I think that would be very helpful. It's a big package with lots of
dependencies, so
