Achim Schneider wrote:
Erm...
There is this story about some military (US afair) training a neural
net to detect tanks in images, I can't find the link right now.
It worked, with amazing 100% accuracy.
Then they threw another batch of images at the net.
It worked, with devastating 50%
Albert Y. C. Lai writes:
Achim Schneider wrote:
There is this story about some military (US afair) training a neural
net to detect tanks in images
...
50% accuracy.
I have some similar stories to tell
A. ... students assumed
sin(x+y) = sin(x) + sin(y)
B. ... But that day, that car,
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008, at 15:02 , Ketil Malde wrote:
More seriously, perhaps quantum enters into the equation in how the
brain works, perhaps it is even necessary for thought. However, I
get worried it's just another mystical mantra, a gratuitous factor
that, lacking
ChrisK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how the brain works appears to be though electro- and bio-
chemistry, which are best modeled/described right now by quantum
mechanics.
Erm...
There is this story about some military (US afair) training a neural
net to detect tanks in images, I can't find the
On 2008-01-06, ChrisK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008, at 15:02 , Ketil Malde wrote:
More seriously, perhaps quantum enters into the equation in how the
brain works, perhaps it is even necessary for thought. However, I
get worried it's just another
Achim Schneider wrote:
There is this story about some military (US afair) training a neural
net to detect tanks in images, I can't find the link right now.
It worked, with amazing 100% accuracy.
Then they threw another batch of images at the net.
It worked, with devastating 50%
Peter Verswyvelen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding this the universe is a turing machine: until a couple of
years ago, I also was someone that believed that (A) the universe
(and life) could be simulated by a computer,
Yesss. Nice. A bit of Escher here:
Imagine an instance of eval
