Didn't think it was overly slow, just that I could do better :-).
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 16:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jefferson Heard wrote:
> > Argh, bitten by the scheme bug! Right -- NO tail recursion... So that
> > leaves me with some rather non-intuitive strategies for achieving
>
Jefferson Heard wrote:
> Argh, bitten by the scheme bug! Right -- NO tail recursion... So that leaves
> me with some rather non-intuitive strategies for achieving execution time
> efficiency. Anyone care to point me in the direction of a document on
> efficiency in Haskell?
Besides, proper ta
