Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Ubuntu Haskell

2008-10-17 Thread Magnus Therning
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 11:25 +0100, Magnus Therning wrote: >> Playing the devil's advocate I'd say that cabal (not the library >> Cabal, but the tool cabal in cabal-install) is only needed on systems >> with pacakge managers

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Ubuntu Haskell

2008-10-16 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 11:25 +0100, Magnus Therning wrote: > > It seems to me that it adds confusion (two ways of installing things > > rather than one) while reducing flexibility and 'freshness' of > > installation. > > To me it adds simplicity. I might be developing an in-house tool at > work,

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Ubuntu Haskell

2008-10-14 Thread Magnus Therning
2008/10/14 Titto Assini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Magnus, > > you wife must be very advanced if she plans to install xmonad, I read > the installation docs recently and recoiled in horror :-) Installing xmonad in Debian Sid is extremely simple, thanks to it being packaged in the distro. > To go b

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Ubuntu Haskell

2008-10-14 Thread Titto Assini
Hi Magnus, you wife must be very advanced if she plans to install xmonad, I read the installation docs recently and recoiled in horror :-) To go back to the subject under discussion, I can perfectly see the need for having ready made distribution packages for: - the haskell compilers - cabal - a

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Ubuntu Haskell

2008-10-14 Thread Ariel J. Birnbaum
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 10:33:17 Titto Assini wrote: > Can anyone explain why, now that we have cabal and therefore package > installation is just a short "cabal install X" away do we need > distribution specific binary packages? One reason I can think of is foreign (read "not Haskell") depend

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Ubuntu Haskell

2008-10-14 Thread Magnus Therning
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Titto Assini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anyone explain why, now that we have cabal and therefore package > installation is just a short "cabal install X" away do we need > distribution specific binary packages? > > I personally prefer my hackage packages fres

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Ubuntu Haskell

2008-10-14 Thread Titto Assini
Can anyone explain why, now that we have cabal and therefore package installation is just a short "cabal install X" away do we need distribution specific binary packages? I personally prefer my hackage packages freshly cooked ... titto On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:52 AM, Ariel J. Birnbaum <[

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Ubuntu Haskell

2008-10-13 Thread Ariel J. Birnbaum
> Pray tell, what kind of feats are expected of such a champion? No answer. I guess my failed attempt at chivalrous-sounding wit killed the message. I'll rephrase: Does the job consist of: Maintaining an independent repository of Haskell packages configured and compiled for the current (probabl

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Ubuntu Haskell

2008-10-12 Thread Ariel J. Birnbaum
> > Have you thought about doing this for Ubuntu? If you know how to > > automatically generate packages, you could set up a PPA (private package > > archive) on Launchpad. > > I've spoken with Jeremy Shaw, who has similar systems in place, based > also on Cabal (and cabal-install), for generating

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Ubuntu Haskell

2008-10-11 Thread Don Stewart
ashley: > Don Stewart wrote: > >* Arch now has 609 Haskell packages in AUR. > > Have you thought about doing this for Ubuntu? If you know how to > automatically generate packages, you could set up a PPA (private package > archive) on Launchpad. I've spoken with Jeremy Shaw, who has similar