On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 22:12 +0200, Mads Lindstrøm wrote:
> > > I had newer seen anybody use "forall a." in function signatures before,
> > > and therefore was curious about its effect. This is probably do to my
> > > inexperience regarding Haskell.
The "forall a." syntax is not Haskell 98. The u
Hi John Goerzen
> On 2005-06-27, Mads Lindstrøm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi John
> >
> >> test :: forall a. (Num a) => a
> >> test = 2 * 5 + 3
>
> [ snip ]
>
> > I had newer seen anybody use "forall a." in function signatures before,
> > and therefore was curious about its effect. This is
On 2005-06-27, Mads Lindstrøm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi John
>
>> test :: forall a. (Num a) => a
>> test = 2 * 5 + 3
[ snip ]
> I had newer seen anybody use "forall a." in function signatures before,
> and therefore was curious about its effect. This is probably do to my
> inexperience rega
