[Haskell-cafe] Re: cabal upgrade

2008-10-01 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:58:53AM +0100, Malcolm Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a message of 23 lines which said: Indeed, the advice given by each of these tools IIRC was to update every time you used it, before doing anything else. (So why was it a manual task then?) You can put it in

[Haskell-cafe] Re: cabal upgrade

2008-10-01 Thread Achim Schneider
Svein Ove Aas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Duncan Coutts Because we actually consult the index of available packages more often than you think. Every time you cabal install in a local directory we make sure all the required packages are available and

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: cabal upgrade

2008-10-01 Thread Svein Ove Aas
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Achim Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Additionally, you could use rsync instead of a tbz download to speed things up. Gentoo does this right. It wouldn't be *that* much faster, and the server load would be higher. The current package index is.. what, half a

[Haskell-cafe] Re: cabal upgrade

2008-10-01 Thread Stefan Monnier
It's something to consider in the future, although a change-aware filesystem (git, say? It's fast) would probably be better. ^^^ You misspelled darcs. Stefan ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: cabal upgrade

2008-10-01 Thread Svein Ove Aas
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Stefan Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's something to consider in the future, although a change-aware filesystem (git, say? It's fast) would probably be better. ^^^ You misspelled darcs. I know how git would improve on darcs here: It's